The native range of the freshwater bream Abramis brama includes the basins of the North, Baltic, White, Azov, Black, Caspian and Aral seas. This species is not a popular object of aquaculture, but it is cultivated in some countries of Eastern Europe and Central Asia. In the water bodies of Italy, Spain, Portugal, England and China, it is a naturalized alien species that does not have a large number. At first freshwater bream was introduced into the Ob basin in 1862, in the reservoirs of the eastern slope Urals. By the end of the 19th century, bream became common in this region, but spread slowly downstream: in the Lower Irtysh it was noted only in the mid-1920s, and entered the commercial statistics in 1936. It became known in the Middle Irtysh in the 1930s, but it became an object of fishing only in 1963. In the lakes of the Ob-Irtysh interfluve, at first bream was introduced in 1928. In the largest of them, it became naturalized. In the Ubinskoye lake the bream formed a stable self-reproducing population, which served as a source of juvenile bream for resettlement in water bodies of Siberia and Kazakhstan in the middle of the twentieth century. Currently, the bream in the Ubinskoye lake does not inhabit due to the shall owing of the lake. Bream was introduced into the Novosibirsk reservoir in 1957–1960. It quickly became numerous and began to spread up and down the river Ob. It has been known in the Upper Ob in the Altai Region since the early 1960s, and in the Middle Ob in the Tomsk Region since the end of the same decade. Currently, the catch of bream in the Ob basin are maximum in the Bukhtarma reservoir, relatively large in the Novosibirsk reservoir and in the water bodies of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Region. At the same time, the share of this species in the total volume of fish catch in large reservoirs of the Ob basin is about 80% of the fishing, in the Middle Ob and Middle Irtysh — about 20%, and in the north of Western Siberia — less than 0.5%. The decrease in the share of bream in the fishery from south to north reflects not only a decrease in the abundance of this species in the latitudinal direction, but also an increase in the stocks of native fish species.