По всем вопросам звоните:

+7 495 274-22-22

УДК: 378 DOI:10.33920/nik-02-2009-09

The United States Strategy and Tactics in the Middle East Region from the End of the Second World War to the Arab Spring. Scientific and methodological materials in the field of International Relations

Anna Filimonova Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of International Relations and Diplomacy of the Faculty of Economics, Management and International Relations of Moscow University for the Humanities 5, Yunosti str., Moscow, 111395, Russia Email address: annafilimon@yandex.ru
Sergey Ivanov fourth-year student of the Department of International Relations and Diplomacy of the Faculty of Economics, Management, and International Relations of Moscow University for the Humanities 5, Yunosti str., Moscow, 111395, Russia Email address: intrelation@mosgu.ru

Being the most powerful state in the world, the United States has a key influence on the processes taking place in the Middle East. In this regard, the analysis of the strategic paradigm of American policy in the Middle East and the tactics of its implementation from the beginning of its formation is important both for understanding the specifics of the processes taking place in the region and for assessing their impact on the world political process. The material of the article is of scientific and methodological significance in the field of International Relations.

Литература:

1. Ashvad Abbas Blizhniy Vostok v strategii SShA (2008) [Electronic resource] // Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Politologiya. №1. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/blizhniyvostok-v-strategii-ssha [saved in Wayback Machine] (accessed: 30.04.2020).

2. D.A. Belashchenko, I.D. Komarov. Sobytiya «Arabskoy vesny» v kontekste realizatsii proekta «Bol'shoy Blizhniy Vostok» [Events of the "Arab Spring" in the Context of the "Greater Middle East" Project] (2012) [Electronic resource] // Vestnik NNGU. No. 6-1. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sobytiya-arabskoy-vesny-v-kontekste-realizatsiiproekta-bolshoy-blizhniy-vostok [saved in Wayback Machine] (accessed: April 30, 2020).

3. I.P. Dobaev, N.N. Gontarenko. Radikalizatsiya islamskogo dvizheniya na Blizhnem i Srednem Vostoke: vyzovy, riski i ugrozy dlya natsional'noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii (2018) [Radicalization of the Islamic Movement in the Near and Middle East: Challenges, Risks and Threats to the National Security of the Russian Federation (2018)] [Electronic resource] // Rossiya i musul'manskiy mir. No. 3 (309). URL: https:// cyberleninka.ru/article/n/radikalizatsiya-islamskogo-dvizheniya-na-blizhnem-isrednem-vostoke-vyzovy-riski-i-ugrozy-dlya-natsionalnoy-bezopasnosti-rossiyskoy-1 [saved in Wayback Machine] (accessed: May 20, 2020).

4. O.E. Mitrofanenkova. Narkopolitika SShA v Afganistane (1990 - 2010-e gg.) [US drug Policy in Afghanistan (1990s - 2010s)] (2019) [Electronic resource] // Vostochnaya analitika. No. 3. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/narkopolitika-ssha-v-afganistane1990-2010-e-gg [saved in Wayback Machine] (accessed: May 20, 2020).

5. Nessar Omar. "Bonnskaya model'" i politicheskiy protsess v Afganistane v 20012004 gg. [The Bonn Model and the Political Process in Afghanistan in 2001-2004.] (2014) [Electronic resource] // Vestnik KIGI RAS. No. 1. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ bonnskaya-model-i-politicheskiy-protsess-v-afganistane-v-2001-2004-gg [saved in Wayback Machine] (accessed: May 20, 2020).

6. Podtserob A.B. Arabskie strany v sisteme mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy (2011) [Arab Countries in the System of International Relations (2011)] [Electronic resource] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 25. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya i mirovaya politika. No. 1. [International relations and world politics. No. 1.] URL: https:// cyberleninka.ru/article/n/arabskie-strany-v-sisteme-mezhdunarodnyh-otnosheniy [saved in Wayback Machine] (accessed: May 06, 2020).

7. A.S. Sorokin, A.A. Ermakov. Dinamika asimmetrichnogo konflikta gosudarstva Izrail' s radikal'nymi organizatsiyami Sektora Gaza (2006-2009 gg.) [Dynamics of the Asymmetric Conflict Between the State of Israel and Radical Organizations in the Gaza Strip (2006-2009)] (2014) [Electronic resource] // Vestnik NNGU. No. 5-1. URL: https:// cyberleninka.ru/article/n/dinamika-asimmetrichnogo-konflikta-gosudarstva-izrail-sradikalnymi-organizatsiyami-sektora-gaza-2006-2009-gg [saved in Wayback Machine] (accessed: May 20, 2020).

8. K.A. Fursov. Politika SShA na Blizhnem i Srednem Vostoke i islamskiy terrorizm. [US Policy in the Near and Middle East and Islamic Terrorism.] (Consolidated Abstract) (2015) [Electronic resource] // Social and Human Sciences. Domestic and foreign literature. Ser. 9. Oriental Studies and African Studies: Abstract journal. No. 2. URL: https:// cyberleninka.ru/article/n/2015-02-012-014-politika-ssha-na-blizhnem-i-srednemvostoke-i-islamskiy-terrorizm-svodnyy-referat [saved in Wayback Machine] (accessed: May 20, 2020).

The world community at the turn of the XX and XXI centuries entered a qualitatively new stage of its development. The collapse of the bipolar system, processes of globalization, increasing number and changing quality parameters of conflicts, the formation of new types of participants, as well as new models of post-conflict settlement under the direct leadership of the world hegemon – the United States and its NATO allies – reveal the need for serious study of the United States strategy and tactics for transforming the Middle East region.

The Middle East has a number of unique features that set it apart from many other regions of the world. It is difficult to compare any other corner of the world with the Middle East in terms of its geopolitical position, since it is located at the junction of three parts of the world: Europe, Asia, and Africa. It is no accident that almost all the powerful world nations tried at one time to establish control over it, declaring it as the area of their "vital" interests. They who controlled the Middle East controlled the Eastern part of the Mediterranean basin and the Western part of the Indian Ocean basin. The Middle East was the cradle of two world religions in the course of historical development: Christianity and Islam, in other words, it was the center of the birth of two world cultures.

The foreign policy strategy of the United States in the Middle East is reflected in National Security Strategies, official documents, analytical articles that reveal the goals, objectives, and motives of Washington's actions in the region. The foreign policy of the United States is influenced not only by official doctrines, but also by analytical reports that are the result of the work of more than a hundred scientific institutions that regularly analyze the situation in the Middle East.

The United States came to the Middle East region relatively late: in the XIX century. After the end of the First World War and the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, the main foreign countries competing with each other in this region were Great Britain and France, with stronger positions of London. The United Kingdom tried to eliminate external interference in the Middle East in order to independently control the Suez Canal, the region of the Persian Gulf, and the Gulf of Aden. The policy of the United Kingdom was based on a "triple containment" strategy, in which London sought to maintain a balance of power between Iran, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia. The United States, in contrast to the United Kingdom, set primarily economic goals in the Middle East before the end of the Second World War. The region gained its geostrategic significance for Washington only after 1945.

Для Цитирования:
Anna Filimonova, Sergey Ivanov, The United States Strategy and Tactics in the Middle East Region from the End of the Second World War to the Arab Spring. Scientific and methodological materials in the field of International Relations. Ученый совет. 2020;9.
Полная версия статьи доступна подписчикам журнала
Язык статьи:
Действия с выбранными: