По всем вопросам звоните:

+7 495 274-22-22

УДК: 616.9 DOI:10.33920/med-01-2012-02

Doctors’ mental responses to SARS-CoV-2 pandemic situation (article 3)

Kinkul’kina Marina Arkad’evna PhD in Medicine, Member of the Academy of Sciences, Head of the Department of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Ministry of Health of the Russia, Moscow.
Gardanova Zhanna Robertovna PhD in Medicine, Professor, Head of the Department of Psychotherapy
Novikov Vladimir Vladimirovich PhD in Medicine, Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, I.P. Pavlov Ryazan State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, Ryazan, novlad2006@ya.ru, tel. 89109024594, 61, 24 Bronnaya str., Ryazan, 390010
Khritinin Dmitrii Fedorovich PhD in Medicine, Member of the Academy of Sciences, Professor of the Department of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow.
Khritinin Aleksandr Dmitrievich PhD Candidate in Medicine, Senior Researcher at the Department of Orthopaedic Stomatology and Implantology, Central Research Institute of Dental and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow
Novikova Anna Mikhailovna Head of the Department of Narcology, Ryazan Regional Clinical Narcological Dispensary, Ryazan

This article continues considering the variety of doctors’ mental responses to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic situation, (part of them was described in articles 1 and 2), in the context of possible psychotherapeutic and psycho-corrective effects on doctors, to prevent the negative pandemic condition impact on their quality of life, adaptation and presence/level of anxiety disorders and anosognosia.

Литература:

1. Lifintsev D.V. Sotsial’naia podderzhka kak psikhologicheskii fenomen [Social Support as a Psychological Phenomenon]. Questions of psychology. 2014; 5: 105–117.

2. Gable S. L. Good news! Capitalizing on positive events in an interpersonal context / S. L. Gable, H.T. Reis. Advances in experimental social psychology; M.P. Zanna (Ed.). — San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press. 2010; 42: 195–257.

3. Obshchaia psikhologiia. Slovar’. Psikhologicheskii leksikon [General Psychology. Dictionary. The Psychological Lexicon]. Encyclopedic Dictionary: in 6 Volumes. — Moscow: PER SE. 2005: 251 pages.

4. Suls J., Fletcher B. The relative efficacy of avoidant and no avoidant coping strategies: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology. 1985; 4: 249–288.

5. Bodrov V.A. Psikhologicheskii stress: razvitie i preodolenie [Psychological Stress: Development and Overcoming]. — Moscow: PER SE. 2006: 528 pages.

6. Meichenbaum D. Cognitive — Behavior Modification: An Integrative Approach. Plenum press. — New York. 1997.

7. Schrodt G.R. et. ail. Practical applications of cognitive — behavioral therapy in anxiety disorders. Clinical managment of anxiety / Ed. by J. A. den Boer. — N. Y. — Basel. — Hong-Kong. 1997: 151–177.

Our research of several doctors of various specialities (n = 72, average age 45.58 ± 10.18 years, a detailed description is available in the 2 previous articles) showed the presence of some mental responses and is accompanied by increasing general anxiety as a result of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic impact. We also identified the negative impact of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on almost all life quality indicators (except social functioning). 43.1 % of doctors experienced emotional difficulties due to SARS-CoV-2, this indicator was positively correlated with the presence and intensity of anxiety symptoms (rs = 0.493; p = 0.01; n = 72 and rs = 0.456; p = 0.01; n = 72, respectively). Assessing SARS-CoV-2 danger level, 69.5 % of doctors considered it high, 4.2 % — extremely high, 19.4 % — exaggerated, and 6.9 % — low.

Coping strategies that were significantly more common in doctors experiencing emotional difficulties due to SARS-CoV-2 («Search for social support» (rs = 0.349; p = 0.01; n = 72) and «Escape-avoidance» (rs = 0.290; p = 0.05; n = 72)) were considered by us as insufficiently effective, in contrast to «Confrontational coping» (rs = 0.235; p = 0.05; n = 72). Thus, we found that the basis of mental adaptation disorders of doctors who are actively coping with the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic situation is a stereotyped personal response, aimed primarily at reducing emotional discomfort but not at resolving the problem situation.

We continued to consider doctors’ mental responses to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic situation in the context of possible psychotherapeutic and psycho-corrective effects.

We conducted k-means clustering (Table 1) for more complete assessment of the impact of coping strategies on mental responses.

We can see based on the data obtained that indicators (final cluster centres) of group 1 are mostly lower than the standard interval of 40–60 T-points, while in group 2 they correspond to it, which indicates good adaptability of most doctors. If we also take into account the initial cluster centres, we can talk about two groups of doctors who passively or actively cope with the stressful impact of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic (selection variables were the presence of emotional difficulties connected with COVID-19, the level of anosognosia, the intensity of anxiety on the Hamilton scale).

Для Цитирования:
Kinkul’kina Marina Arkad’evna, Gardanova Zhanna Robertovna, Novikov Vladimir Vladimirovich, Khritinin Dmitrii Fedorovich, Khritinin Aleksandr Dmitrievich, Novikova Anna Mikhailovna, Doctors’ mental responses to SARS-CoV-2 pandemic situation (article 3). Вестник неврологии, психиатрии и нейрохирургии. 2020;12.
Полная версия статьи доступна подписчикам журнала
Язык статьи:
Действия с выбранными: