По всем вопросам звоните:

+7 495 274-22-22

УДК: 338.2 DOI:10.33920/vne-04-2205-05

Влияние организационных инноваций на эффективность организации на основе моделирования структурными уравнениями

Хуан Сяоянь аспирант, ФГАОУ ВО «Российский университет дружбы народов», 117198, Россия, г. Москва, ул. Миклухо-Маклая, д. 6, E-mail: 547165861@qq.com, ORCID: 0000-0002-8675-3817

Целью данного исследования является изучение влияния организационных инноваций на организационную эффективность. В этой статье предлагается первоначальная модель взаимосвязи между организационными инновациями, инновационной компетенцией и эффективностью посредством обсуждения литературы и построения исследовательской гипотезы. Методология, используемая в работе, подробно разработана с трех аспектов: измерение переменных, сбор данных и основные методы анализа. В данной работе предлагается система переменных показателей измерения. Подтверждающий факторный анализ и анализ надежности выполняются на связанных данных и переменных. Результаты показывают, что меры каждой переменной, сохраненные в анализе модели, соответствуют требованиям надежности и достоверности и могут быть проанализированы с помощью моделирования структурными уравнениями. Основной вывод этого исследования: 1. Организационные инновации оказывают значительное положительное влияние на организационную инновационную компетентность. 2. Организационные инновации оказывают значительное положительное влияние на эффективность организации. Инновации в организационной структуре оказывают значительное положительное влияние на эффективность организации. Инновации в организационных процессах оказывают значительное положительное влияние на эффективность организации. Организационные культурные инновации оказывают значительное положительное влияние на эффективность организации. Инновации в области информационных технологий оказывают значительное положительное влияние на эффективность организации. 3. Организационная инновационная компетентность оказывает значительное положительное влияние на эффективность организации. 4. Организационная инновационная компетентность играет посреднический эффект между организационными инновациями и эффективностью организации. Это доказывает, что организационные инновации должны повышать организационную эффективность за счет накопления организационной инновационной компетентности. Выводы этого исследования могут быть применены к инновациям и управлению производственными предприятиями.

Литература:

1. Pandey, S., & Sharma, R. (2009). Organizational factors for exploration and exploitation. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation. Vol. 4 (1). Pp. 48–58. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242009000100005.

2. Deming, Z. (2010). An empirical study on the relationship between manufacturing enterprise performance and organizational learning: from the perspective of organizational innovation. Hunan: Science and Technology, 24–39. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:KXXG.0.2010-01-010.

3. Damanpour, F. & Aravind, D. (2012). Managerial innovation: conceptions, processes, and antecedents. Management And Organization Review. Vol. 8 (2). Pp. 423–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00233.

4. Kasemsap, K. (2017). Strategic Innovation Management: An integrative framework and causal model of knowledge management, strategic orientation, organizational innovation, and organizational performance. Organizational Culture and Behavior: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. Pp. 86–101. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1913-3.ch005.

5. Ou Yan. (2013). Research on the relationship between organizational inertia, organizational innovation and organizational performance in manufacturing. (Doctoral dissertation, Chongqing University). https://doi.org/10.7666/d.y2151611.

6. Xu Zhaoming (2011). An empirical study on the relationship between knowledge creation, organizational innovation and organizational performance. Contemporary Economics (22), 5. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.10079378.2011.22.062.

7. Wang Xin. Research on the relationship between organizational innovation and organizational performance. (Doctoral dissertation, Chengdu University of Technology). https://doi.org/CNKI:CDMD:2.1012.499970.

8. Huang Peilun, Shang Hangbiao, & Zhao Lizhu. (2008). A study on the relationship between organizational innovation, organizational competence and organizational performance. Journal of Management. Vol. 5 (002). Pp. 250–257. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-884X.2008.02.018.

9. So Young Sohna* & Chan Sik Junga. (2010). Effect of creativity on innovation: do creativity initiatives have significant impact on innovative performance in korean firms? Creativity Research Journal. Vol. 22 (3). Pp. 320–328.

10. Chen, C. J. & Yeh, Y. C. (2009). Creativity mechansm, knowledge management capacity, and innovation performance. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMC.2007.5235068.

11. Chen Weiya & Liu Haifeng (2008). Leadership Creativity: Leading Enterprise Innovation. Human Resource Development in China (10), 4. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:ZRZK.0.2008-10-005.

12. Liu Chao, Liu Xinmei & Li Muhan (2013). Organizational Creativity and Organizational Innovation Performance: The Moderating Effect of Strategic Orientation. Research Management, 34 (011). Pp. 95–102. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2995.2013.11.012.

13. Tippins, M. J. & Sohi, R. S. (2003). The Relationship Between IT Competency and Firm Performance: Is Organizational Learning the Missing Link? John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 24 (8). Pp. 745–761. https://doi.org/10.1002/ smj.337.

14. Zhang Hong (2014). An empirical study on the relationship between organizational culture and organizational performance in private enterprises. (Doctoral dissertation, Harbin Institute of Technology). https://doi.org/10.7666/d.D592674.

15. Meng Kun, Xiong Zhongkai, & Dai Weiliang (2010). An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Knowledge Management and Organizational Performance: From the Perspective of Organizational Culture. Management World (5), 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05297-2_43.

16. Wang Xin, Xu Ming (2017). Organizational Absorptive Capacity, Service Process Innovation and Service Innovation Performance: A Mixed Model Analysis from a Customer-Oriented Perspective. Science and Technology Progress and Countermeasures, 34 (12), 6. https://doi.org/10.6049/kjjbydc.2016080045.

17. Ljubicic, F. (2016). The Importance of Organizational Structure and Corporate Culture in Open Innovation Performance.

18. Lee, G. H., Kim, Y. G. (1998). Implementing an interrelated IT innovation in the Korean industry. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society.

19. Xie Weihong, Shan Peixin, Jiang Luan. (2012). An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Information Technology competence and Enterprise Performance: The Mediating Effect of Structural Flexibility: A Case Study of Manufacturing Enterprises in the Pearl River Delta. Soft Science, 26 (3). Pp. 91–95. https://doi.org/10.3969/j. issn.1001-8409.2012.03.020.

20. HG Gemünden, Ritter, T., Heydebreck, P. (1996). Network configuration and innovation success: an empirical analysis in german high-tech industries. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13 (5). Pp. 449–462. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(96)00026-2.

21. Bell, G. G. (2005). Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal. 26 (3). Vol. 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.448.

22. Liu Jingjiang. Research on the Mechanism and Mode of Organizational Innovation of Manufacturing Enterprises in the Network Environment. (Doctoral dissertation, Zhejiang University). https://doi.org/ CNKI:CDMD:1.2004.074704.

23. Lee, H. & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance. Journal of Management Information Systems.

24. Chen Zihui. (2010). Organizational Learning, Research on the Influence of Information Technology competence on Organizational Innovation (Doctoral dissertation, Guangdong University of Technology). https://doi.org/10.7666/d.y1745865.

25. Zhang Jiangfeng (2019). An Exploratory Study on the Dimensions and Measurement of Consumption Motivation Structure of Conformity. Technology and Innovation Management, 40 (2), 5. https://doi.org/ CNKI:SUN:KJRC.0.2019-02-024.

26. Anderson, J. C. & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice. Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3). Pp. 411–423.

27. Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). London: Prentice-Hall International.

28. Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51 (06). Pp. 1173–82.

29. Krull, J., L., MacKinnon, D. & P. (1999). Multilevel mediation modeling in group-based intervention studies. Evaluation Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X9902300404.

30. Mackinnon, D. P. Goldberg, L., Clarke, G. N., Elliot, D. L., Cheong, J. W. & Lapin, A., et al. (2001). Mediating mechanisms in a program to reduce intentions to use anabolic steroids and improve exercise self-efficacy and dietary behavior. Prevention Science, 2 (1). Pp. 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101008282800.

An organization must be flexible enough to adapt to the unpredictable external environment, must be creative enough to innovate, and must have enough responsiveness to learn [1]. Enterprise organizations must continuously improve their organizational innovation competence through organizational innovation, in order to obtain sustained competitive advantages and high innovation rents on the edge of chaos.

This study believes that organizational innovation not only has a direct impact on organizational performance, but they also have an indirect impact on organizational performance. The sum of the two is the total impact of organizational innovation elements on organizational performance. On the whole, companies continue to improve their organizational innovation competence through information technology innovation, organizational culture innovation, process innovation, and organizational structure innovation. At the same time, the accumulated organizational innovation competence promote the improvement of organizational performance.

According to the literature and theoretical research reviews, this paper proposed that the enterprise’s organization system consists of six interacting and interdependent dimensions: (1) corporate strategy; (2) organizational culture; (3) technology; (4) processes; (5) organizational structure; (6) Human resources. And the whole organizational system is an open system that interacts with the external environment. The role of people is reflected in the other five dimensions. At the same time, organizational culture, information technology, processes, and organizational structure reflect the overall company strategy. Therefore, organizational cultural innovation, information technology innovation, organizational process innovation, and organizational structure innovation are the essential elements of an organization’s innovation system.

Many scholars have verified that organizational innovation has a positive impact on organizational performance. For example, Deming (2010) conducted an empirical test on the relationship between organizational innovation, organizational learning, and organizational performance by taking 125 manufacturing enterprises in China as the survey object. The research results show that organizational learning does not directly affect organizational performance in manufacturing enterprises, but has a positive impact on organizational performance indirectly through the mediating effect of organizational innovation [2].

Для Цитирования:
Хуан Сяоянь, Влияние организационных инноваций на эффективность организации на основе моделирования структурными уравнениями. Международная экономика. 2022;5.
Полная версия статьи доступна подписчикам журнала
Язык статьи:
Действия с выбранными: