From early prototypes of the 1960s to the present-day omnipresence, personal computers and Internet have had a significant impact on the world's current reality, including most of the generally accepted parameters of life quality: well-being and employment, education, amount of free time and leisure possibilities, social networks and much more. Let's look at these provisions in more detail.
Digitalization has created new jobs and job opportunities, and made remote work possible which most people would find fantastic in the 1990s, and hence to new labour markets. During the lockdown, it turned out that remote working didn't only have shortcomings but also some advantages, the most important of which was a considerable saving of time. This fact has upended the traditional notion of a job as a place of work: it is no longer connected to a particular location. More and more jobs become cloud-hosted and can be done from any place with Internet access: this is aptly demonstrated by the fact that, according to the experts, soon not only medical consultations but also surgeries will be available remotely through the use of advanced robotic technologies. At the dawn of the millennium this, in turn, gave rise to the phenomenon of "digital nomads": they are specialists in various fields who work remotely via the Internet and therefore are no longer bound to a particular place of residence.
As a consequence, the digital nomads have a cosmopolitan and openminded view of the world without cultural and national boundaries, and attachment to national values, holidays and customs. Although this way of life is still considered marginal in today's world, the apparent increase in the number of "digital nomads" suggests (makes us speak of) significant restructuring of social and cultural values in general and of the concept of state in particular. For example, the French philosophers Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari in their book "Capitalism and Schizophrenia" set Nomadology and the State (as an apparatus straining towards stability and, consequently, towards a settled way of life of the world) in opposition to each other [1, p. 617].